Proposal for Breed Division & New Breed
American Kennel Club Board of Directors

AKC Staff Foreword
The United States Australian Shepherd Association (USASA), with guidance and input from staff, has been
working for four years to determine how best to deal with the “Miniature Australian Shepherd,” a
miniaturization of the Australian Shepherd. Though it was never intended by USASA or AKC, the “mini” as it
is sometimes known, has become part of the USASA stud book. USASA estimates as much as 15% of its stud
book consists of the Miniature Australian Shepherd and feels that going forward this percentage must be
drastically reduced if its stud book is to be strictly representative of the Australian Shepherd (Preferred heights:
males 20” – 23”, females 18” – 21”).

Two years ago staff concluded that the best way forward might be to separate the “mini” from the Aussie,
forming a new AKC breed. At the invitation of staff, and after agreeing the conditions under which USASA
could join this initiative, USASA and staff started discussions with NAMASCUSA, the oldest and largest of the
Miniature Australian Shepherd parent clubs, to achieve this objective. The result is the proposal presented here
by the USASA Board, drafted with guidance and input from staff, and supported by the NAMASCUSA Board.
Broadly, it offers the AKC Board the following for consideration.
1) Acceptance of a new breed by AKC for the smaller size dogs, name as yet to be determined.
2) Allowance for dogs to be relocated from the current Australian Shepherd Stud Book to the new
Upon approval by the AKC Board of Directors, the USASA membership will be balloted to confirm their
support. It is unlikely the USASA membership will withhold support for this proposal. The NAMASCUSA
membership will also be balloted to confirm their support. In the event their support is not forthcoming, AKC
staff and USASA have alternative plans to achieve the aims of this proposal.

USASA Proposal - Introduction
A substantial number of Miniature Australian Shepherds have found their way into the United States Australian
Shepherd Association (USASA) stud book. While these dogs are clearly members of the Australian Shepherd
family, they have a separate foundation and history. Most importantly they are specifically bred to be a
different size from the Australian Shepherd. For these reasons, the United States Australian Shepherd
Association (USASA) proposes that these dogs be allowed to leave its stud book to form the basis of a new
AKC recognized breed. Along with these dogs, USASA wishes to make provision for undersize Australian
Shepherds - as designated by breeders or owners - to relocate to the new breed,
Besides the Miniature Australian Shepherds currently registered in the USASA stud book, there are a large
number that have been bred true and registered outside of AKC, most notably under the aegis of the North
American Miniature Australian Shepherd Club of the USA (NAMASCUSA). USASA proposes that the dogs in
the NAMASCUSA registry be incorporated into the new breed, along with other dogs of the new breed from
other registries, as appropriate.

Note on terminology: The USASA membership requires the eventual name of the new breed to be separate and
distinct, meaning it will not reference “Australian Shepherd.” This has been agreed by the NAMASCUSA
Board and AKC staff, but the new name has not yet been decided. So, this proposal will reference the proposed
new breed as “MAS” in an effort to avoid confusion over names.

The specifics of the proposal are enumerated below.
USASA Proposal
1. A new AKC breed will be created, consisting of dogs from three main sources. First, there are
the MAS that were inadvertently admitted into to the USASA registry. Second, there are the
MAS in the NAMASCUSA registry. Third, any MAS that are deemed eligible from other
2. The USASA membership is insistent that there be a clear distinction between the two breeds,
without confusion over their names. Therefore, going forward, the name of the new breed
cannot reference “Australian Shepherd,” directly or indirectly. A similar example of this is the
Norfolk and Norwich Terrier. The basic difference between the two is the ears – nonetheless
there are two distinct names for the breeds.
3. It is recommended that NAMASCUSA be the parent club for the new breed. NAMASCUSA
will make its registry records available to AKC on an agreed date and as of that time the dogs
listed in that registry will be eligible to be recorded as three generation dogs in the AKC
Foundation Stock Service. Once the breed is set up in the AKC System, and the minimum
number of dogs is enrolled, the breed will become eligible for the Miscellaneous Class at the
next entrance date. Based upon enrollment figures, the breed may request to move to full
recognition when eligible.
4. Dogs that are in the NAMASCUSA registry will be immediately eligible for three generation
enrollment in the AKC Foundation Stock Service, which will then convert to full AKC
registration. Enrollment of these dogs in the AKC Foundation Stock Service is voluntary, not
5. The MAS will be recorded with a Herding Group designation.
6. It is requested that for a period of three years, MAS and Australian Shepherds – as designated
by owners or breeders – be eligible for reclassification to the new breed within the AKC
system. All dogs that make this switch do so permanently. They cannot move back. This
provision is voluntary. Dogs that move from the USASA to the MAS registry will maintain
titles, points, legs, etc. that have been earned in AKC competition.
Once the three year voluntary reclassification period elapses, it is proposed that the Australian
Shepherd and MAS parent clubs, together with AKC staff, assess whether this voluntary
reclassification has adequately achieved the objective of breed division and propose further
steps, if appropriate.
7. The MAS parent club will provide assistance to AKC to determine which other registries may
be valid to accept for the new breed.
8. The MAS breed standard must contain size disqualifications of 17" at the withers for bitches,
and 18" for dogs. This assures a clear and firm size distinction between the MAS and the
Australian Shepherd. The size distinction between the two breeds must be permanent.
9. ILP/PAL dogs will also have size limits applied. All dogs under 18" at the withers will be
classified as MAS.
This includes dogs that are currently competing. This means that as of the effective date for
inclusion in the Miscellaneous Class, all under 18" inch dogs, including current competitors
such as Willow would automatically move to the new breed. Titles, points, legs, etc., earned in
AKC competition would be maintained.
10. Any future litters must be of the dogs enrolled as MAS (note: new breed name is yet to be
determined) within the AKC in order to be accepted.
11. The official MAS breed history must not conflict with that of the Australian Shepherd and
should be agreed upon by the two breeds. (It is understood that, as with other breeds, there
will be some commonality.)
12. AKC staff will work with NAMASCUSA and AKC Club Liaison to expedite licensing of
affiliated MAS specialty clubs.

General Background for the Proposal

The Australian Shepherd
Historical references to “Australian Shepherd” can be found as far back as the middle of the 19th century. The
dog is a confluence of various herding breeds that made their way to the farms and ranches of the American
West. While the breed is indisputably American, it acquired its Australian moniker – it is thought – because
there were various collie type imports from Australia, some accompanying Basque shepherds, that apparently
made a significant contribution to the character and intelligence of the breed.
The Aussie’s special talents as an all purpose ranch and farm dog generated increasing popularity over the
decades. A breed type started to be recognizable by the beginning of the 20th Century. In the 1940’s the breed
achieved lasting fame as the heart of Jay Sisler’s rodeo act. These dogs inspired breeders such as the Hartnagles
(Las Rocosa), Steve Mansker, Joe Taylor, Walt Lamar, Fletcher Woods, Dick and Leslie Sorensen
(“Colorado”), Dr. Weldon Heard (“Flintridge”), among others to begin actively setting the type for the modern
“Aussie.” The point in mentioning these breeders is that they are a different group from those who were
instrumental in the founding of the MAS.
In 1957 the Australian Shepherd Club of America (ASCA) was formed and not long thereafter opened its own
registry for the breed. The core of the club’s membership and registry was focused on the working Aussie. In
1966, a separate Aussie club was formed with the specific intention of taking the breed into AKC. The
International Australian Shepherd Association (IASA) grew rapidly, establishing its own registry, and by 1972
had registered 2,300 dogs. In addition, the club was holding specialties and National Specialties across the
country. Ultimately IASA merged with ASCA, on the understanding that ASCA would work towards AKC
The first breed standard was written for ASCA in 1977. The authors of that original standard knew the breed
encompassed a large number of different types and freely acknowledged the fact. So, they surveyed hundreds
of Aussies of the generally recognized type. From the data obtained, the standard committee was able to draw a
picture of the breed. When it came to size, the data collected graphed as a normal bell curve, showing most
male Aussies falling within a range of 20” – 23” at the withers and most female Aussies falling within a range
of 18” – 21” at the withers. These ranges dictated the preferred sizes that govern all Australian Shepherd
standards to this day.
After ASCA repeatedly refused to pursue AKC recognition, a group of prominent Aussie fanciers formed
USASA and took the breed in to AKC, starting with the Miscellaneous Class in 1991. Full recognition followed
in 1993.
There were two types of Aussie registrations accepted at the time: 1) ASCA and 2) National Stock Dog
Registry (NSDR). What neither the USASA founders nor AKC appreciated was the fact that NSDR registered
not only Australian Shepherds, but also MAS. Since there was no specific prohibition on NSDR “mini”
registrations, these dogs began to be accepted into the USASA stud book. And that brings us to the story of the
proposed new breed.

In 1962, Ms. Sandy Travis, of Norco, CA, acquired a very small, unregistered bitch, of rough Australian
Shepherd type. This bitch was bred to an unregistered Australian Shepherd and whelped her first litter in 1968.
For many years Ms. Travis interbred these unregistered dogs, without any specific intent of beginning a new
breed. She liked their diminutive size, coupled with their active character and intelligence, and that was reason
enough. Still, these dogs are acknowledged to be the foundation of the MAS.
Between 1978 - 1980, Doris Cordova began to acquire some of Sandy Travis’ dogs, embarking on a program to
specifically create the MAS. In 1980, Ms. Cordova registered Cordova's Spike with NSDR (see appendix). He
is widely recognized as the first registered MAS. During this time Ms. Cordova actively sought breeders who
would continue the development and registration of these dogs as MAS. Most notably among them were
Charles Lasater (Valhalla) and Bill and Sally Kennedy (B/S).
The founding Mini Aussie breeders, in their endeavor to create a miniature version of the Australian Shepherd,
bred the Travis dogs and their offspring to registered Australian Shepherds. The resulting dogs roughly
resembled the Australian Shepherd, but were much smaller. Many breeders of the time, including Ms. Cordova,
acknowledged that these early MAS lacked substance and had a widely varied breed type or “look”. So these
dogs were bred to more Australian Shepherds – “outcrossed” as it is termed – to add substance and type.
By 1990, the breed had grown in numbers and popularity, enabling the formation of the club which is now
NAMASCUSA. Starting in 1992, NAMASCUSA maintained a registry separate from the NSDR, initially
accepting NSDR registered MAS as well as some NSDR and ASCA registered Australian Shepherds. This
registration policy was very soon changed to accept only NSDR MAS dogs or the offspring of MAS and
Australian Shepherd crosses.
As “outcrossing” continued, the line between MAS and Australian Shepherd blurred to the point that many
breeders saw their dogs as a size variety of Australian Shepherd, rather than as a separate breed. When USASA
was recognized in 1991 and AKC started accepting NSDR registrations, some MAS breeders, seeing
themselves as Aussie breeders, registered their dogs with AKC, even though the USASA stud book was not
intended to be open to MAS.
The MAS has grown tremendously in popularity. NAMASCUSA today has a registry that numbers nearly
4,000 dogs. Its membership totals 650 and they show their dogs around the country, including their annual
National Specialty. (A complete set of club statistics appears in the appendix.) And this doesn’t count the dogs
registered elsewhere – e.g. NSDR – or the fanciers who are not NAMASCUSA members.

The MAS clearly belongs to the Australian Shepherd family. But it does maintain a separate genetic history
insofar as it descends from the Travis’ first foundation dogs. Also, the MAS and the Australian Shepherd have
never shared a Parent Club, nor has there been a significant overlap between the two fancies. The size
difference between the two breeds is clear and purposeful.
As stated before, USASA estimates that from 10% to 15% of its stud book is now comprised of MAS and the
descendants that were inadvertently registered as Australian Shepherds. Therefore, USASA wishes these dogs
to be allowed to leave its stud book and be reclassified as a new breed. At the same time, USASA wishes other
dogs in its stud book – as deemed appropriate by breeders or owners – to be eligible for reclassification to the
new proposed new breed.
As part of this process, USASA believes the optimal way to do this is to bring NAMASCUSA in to the AKC
fold, thus immediately enhancing the standing and size of this new breed. This assumes the NAMASCUSA
membership will approve this proposal. If this does not happen, USASA and AKC staff have alternative plans
for achieving the aims of this proposal.
USASA is grateful to the AKC Board for its consideration of this proposal. Since this is essentially a
stud book issue, the club would like to make clear its confidence that its membership and that of
NAMASCUSA will approve this proposal, if and when the AKC Board renders its own approval.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, the United States Australian Shepherd Association,
Yours truly,
Stevens Parr
United States Australian Shepherd Association

. .

As  someone  who  has  both  AKC & ASCA  registered  Australian  Shepherds  and  also  the  MAS  breed,  
I  feel  the  proposal  below  was  NOT  very  well  thought  out  before  being  agreed  upon.  At  the  time, I  voiced  my  opinion  and  objections  to  parts  of  the  proposal,  but  many  people,  including  some  ASCA  foundations  breeders,  fought  to  get  what  they  wanted  in  the proposal  below.  

I  don't  see  how  the  proposal  will  "clean-up"  the  AKC  Australian  Shepherd  studbook  (registry).  
In  fact,  I  believe  it  has  become  a  bigger  problem  now.  Which  is  why  I  am  happy  that  ASCA  does  a  decent  job  of  keeping  the  Mini  bloodlines  out  of  the  ASCA  registry.  ASCA  is  the  only  registry  that  truly  tries  to  protect  the  integrity  of  the  Australian  Shepherd  breed.  

Instead  of  creating  more  clarity  ( like  intended ),  this  MAS  proposal  also  further  "blurrs  the  line" 
between  these  two  AKC  breeds,  ( which  is  exactly  what  some  people  wanted ).  

I  personally  liked  the  proposal  before  this  one,  as  it  made  much  more  sense  and  was  more compatible  with  AKC  registry  rules  ( three  generations ).  Keeping  AKC  or  ASCA  registered  Aussies  in  the  foundation  stock  until  they  were  3  generations  away,  would  have  been  much  better.  There  was  a  group  of  us  who  pushed  for  this  previous  proposal.  

That  said,  like  many  others,  I  took  advantage  of  the  accepted  proposal  while  I  could.  I've  had  my Aussies   for  many  years  and  I  know  the  many  generations  behind  them.  I'm  happy  I  was  able  to   continue  my  Aussie  bloodlines  in  my  MAS  lines.  I  just  think  it  could  have  been  done  without  so  much  confusion  and  feather  ruffling.  

The  proposal  means  a  longer  time  before  the  two  breeds  are  truly  looked  upon  as  separate   breeds,  but  a  day  will  come  when  the  studbooks  close  and  the  AKC  MAS  will  gain  more  respect  as  it's  very  own  breed  ( which  is  a  small  version  of  the  Aussie ).  

~  Tammy